<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OK, this one isn&#8217;t quite so vexing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2005/09/22/ok-this-one-isnt-quite-so-vexing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2005/09/22/ok-this-one-isnt-quite-so-vexing/</link>
	<description>Personal finance, commentary, and spending less the easy way</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:24:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mbhunter</title>
		<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2005/09/22/ok-this-one-isnt-quite-so-vexing/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>mbhunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 05:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightybargainhunter.com/2005/09/22/ok-this-one-isnt-quite-so-vexing/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>ADD, good point.  I&#039;d certainly shop around if I could.  Online banks give way better interest rates on savings accounts than my credit union, that&#039;s for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ADD, good point.  I&#8217;d certainly shop around if I could.  Online banks give way better interest rates on savings accounts than my credit union, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adult ADD and Money</title>
		<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2005/09/22/ok-this-one-isnt-quite-so-vexing/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Adult ADD and Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 20:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightybargainhunter.com/2005/09/22/ok-this-one-isnt-quite-so-vexing/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>The biggest problem is that all financial institution have to operate under a new structure. Financial institutions could afford to take a loss on savings accounts because if a person had a savings or checking accounts they typically had their mortgage and other loans through the same bank. Now that there are so many options available to consumers, financial institutions can&#039;t afford to have loss leaders because consumers can easily shop around to different institutions in person, on the phone , and on-line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest problem is that all financial institution have to operate under a new structure. Financial institutions could afford to take a loss on savings accounts because if a person had a savings or checking accounts they typically had their mortgage and other loans through the same bank. Now that there are so many options available to consumers, financial institutions can&#8217;t afford to have loss leaders because consumers can easily shop around to different institutions in person, on the phone , and on-line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbhunter</title>
		<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2005/09/22/ok-this-one-isnt-quite-so-vexing/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>mbhunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightybargainhunter.com/2005/09/22/ok-this-one-isnt-quite-so-vexing/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Wow -- two months for a copy of a check.  That seems excessive.

Duplicate checks are more expensive, but the extra record of the check is made automatically.  I&#039;ve always used duplicate checks and it&#039;s saved me a couple of times.

What you&#039;re suggesting about having the checks online, that would be great.  Would take a huge amount of bandwidth to do it, but I can see the possibilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8212; two months for a copy of a check.  That seems excessive.</p>
<p>Duplicate checks are more expensive, but the extra record of the check is made automatically.  I&#8217;ve always used duplicate checks and it&#8217;s saved me a couple of times.</p>
<p>What you&#8217;re suggesting about having the checks online, that would be great.  Would take a huge amount of bandwidth to do it, but I can see the possibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy</title>
		<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2005/09/22/ok-this-one-isnt-quite-so-vexing/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightybargainhunter.com/2005/09/22/ok-this-one-isnt-quite-so-vexing/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>I get what you&#039;re saying, but sometimes the technology doesn&#039;t go far enough to make up for the lack of paper statements, etc. For example, I had a check that cleared for a different amount than what I had recorded in my register. Because the company that processed the check did so electronically, my bank didn&#039;t have a copy of it and the company said it would take 6-8 weeks to get me a copy (I&#039;m still waiting - thanks for reminding me to follow up). I managed to figure out what caused the discrepancy, but things would have been so much simpler if I could have just called up a copy of the check online!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get what you&#8217;re saying, but sometimes the technology doesn&#8217;t go far enough to make up for the lack of paper statements, etc. For example, I had a check that cleared for a different amount than what I had recorded in my register. Because the company that processed the check did so electronically, my bank didn&#8217;t have a copy of it and the company said it would take 6-8 weeks to get me a copy (I&#8217;m still waiting &#8211; thanks for reminding me to follow up). I managed to figure out what caused the discrepancy, but things would have been so much simpler if I could have just called up a copy of the check online!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
