<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High-risk real assets vs. boring-old MSFT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2006/05/31/high-risk-real-assets-vs-boring-old-msft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2006/05/31/high-risk-real-assets-vs-boring-old-msft/</link>
	<description>Helping readers to use bargains wisely since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:24:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Financial Freedumb</title>
		<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2006/05/31/high-risk-real-assets-vs-boring-old-msft/comment-page-1/#comment-2451</link>
		<dc:creator>Financial Freedumb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 07:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2006/05/31/high-risk-real-assets-vs-boring-old-msft/#comment-2451</guid>
		<description>I would have to say metals are the safest investments anywhere...problem is theft...but other than that, it&#039;ll always hold value...stocks on the other hand, might grow quickly, but may drop even quicker...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to say metals are the safest investments anywhere&#8230;problem is theft&#8230;but other than that, it&#8217;ll always hold value&#8230;stocks on the other hand, might grow quickly, but may drop even quicker&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

