<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Roth IRA phaseouts really that bad for those phased out?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2007/05/13/are-roth-ira-phaseouts-really-that-bad-for-those-phased-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2007/05/13/are-roth-ira-phaseouts-really-that-bad-for-those-phased-out/</link>
	<description>Personal finance, commentary, and spending less the easy way</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:24:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mbhunter</title>
		<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2007/05/13/are-roth-ira-phaseouts-really-that-bad-for-those-phased-out/comment-page-1/#comment-51152</link>
		<dc:creator>mbhunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 19:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2007/05/13/are-roth-ira-phaseouts-really-that-bad-for-those-phased-out/#comment-51152</guid>
		<description>Samerwriter, you&#039;re right that the way I phrased it wasn&#039;t quite clear (or correct).

You&#039;re also correct that the contributions are not tax-free.  I meant to imply that the tax savings at withdrawal would be larger if one was in a higher marginal tax bracket.  Thanks for helping me to clarify this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samerwriter, you&#8217;re right that the way I phrased it wasn&#8217;t quite clear (or correct).</p>
<p>You&#8217;re also correct that the contributions are not tax-free.  I meant to imply that the tax savings at withdrawal would be larger if one was in a higher marginal tax bracket.  Thanks for helping me to clarify this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dimes</title>
		<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2007/05/13/are-roth-ira-phaseouts-really-that-bad-for-those-phased-out/comment-page-1/#comment-51143</link>
		<dc:creator>dimes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 18:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2007/05/13/are-roth-ira-phaseouts-really-that-bad-for-those-phased-out/#comment-51143</guid>
		<description>Meh, I&#039;m just amazed to see that most of the people I see who have hit the phaseout limits for Roths are not contributing to ANY sort of retirement account, be it a traditional IRA, a TSP or a 401k/403b.  What do they plan to do when they turn 70?  Keep working?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh, I&#8217;m just amazed to see that most of the people I see who have hit the phaseout limits for Roths are not contributing to ANY sort of retirement account, be it a traditional IRA, a TSP or a 401k/403b.  What do they plan to do when they turn 70?  Keep working?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samerwriter</title>
		<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2007/05/13/are-roth-ira-phaseouts-really-that-bad-for-those-phased-out/comment-page-1/#comment-51128</link>
		<dc:creator>samerwriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 17:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2007/05/13/are-roth-ira-phaseouts-really-that-bad-for-those-phased-out/#comment-51128</guid>
		<description>&quot;they’re also saving more in taxes for the same contribution because they’re in a higher marginal tax bracket.&quot;

I&#039;m confused by this statement; a contribution to a Roth IRA is not tax deductible. True, the earnings are tax free, but there is no savings on the initial contribution.

I think there&#039;s a misconception about high income earners, that somehow they&#039;re given special opportunities because of their income.

The difference between making $199,000 and $200,000 is about $500 after taxes. When you hit this income, you don&#039;t start getting special offers in the mail for higher-yielding money market accounts or better mutual funds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;they’re also saving more in taxes for the same contribution because they’re in a higher marginal tax bracket.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m confused by this statement; a contribution to a Roth IRA is not tax deductible. True, the earnings are tax free, but there is no savings on the initial contribution.</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s a misconception about high income earners, that somehow they&#8217;re given special opportunities because of their income.</p>
<p>The difference between making $199,000 and $200,000 is about $500 after taxes. When you hit this income, you don&#8217;t start getting special offers in the mail for higher-yielding money market accounts or better mutual funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
