<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three ways to find a cool deal using Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2010/02/07/three-ways-find-cool-deal-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2010/02/07/three-ways-find-cool-deal-google/</link>
	<description>Helping readers to use bargains wisely since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:24:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pricedropfinder.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2010/02/07/three-ways-find-cool-deal-google/comment-page-1/#comment-208436</link>
		<dc:creator>pricedropfinder.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/?p=2118#comment-208436</guid>
		<description>Well this is probably touting my own horn but why tweak Google when there&#039;re niche sites available for &quot;vertical price comparisons&quot; to find a deal. By vertical I mean sites that track price histories and then you can decide whether a price is a deal or not. Yes my site does that (not repeating the link here per your policy)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this is probably touting my own horn but why tweak Google when there&#8217;re niche sites available for &#8220;vertical price comparisons&#8221; to find a deal. By vertical I mean sites that track price histories and then you can decide whether a price is a deal or not. Yes my site does that (not repeating the link here per your policy)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SimplyForties</title>
		<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2010/02/07/three-ways-find-cool-deal-google/comment-page-1/#comment-207828</link>
		<dc:creator>SimplyForties</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/?p=2118#comment-207828</guid>
		<description>How very interesting.  A bunch of stuff I knew nothing about.  I&#039;m going to play and see what I get.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How very interesting.  A bunch of stuff I knew nothing about.  I&#8217;m going to play and see what I get.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2010/02/07/three-ways-find-cool-deal-google/comment-page-1/#comment-207744</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/?p=2118#comment-207744</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Ann, for your good effort! 

However, one thing I must say…..why only Google. We will definitely use other search engines. For instance, Bing; Bing too offers best coupon deals and cash back. So, why not Bing? There is another Bing-like search engine; it’s AAfter Seach. It too offers cash back and coupon deals. You can also type LAPTOP deals in its search box to get the best deals on laptops. For more deals, you can click on its More Coupons Cash Back link. 
I use both of Bing and AAfter; I use Google lesser than them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Ann, for your good effort! </p>
<p>However, one thing I must say…..why only Google. We will definitely use other search engines. For instance, Bing; Bing too offers best coupon deals and cash back. So, why not Bing? There is another Bing-like search engine; it’s AAfter Seach. It too offers cash back and coupon deals. You can also type LAPTOP deals in its search box to get the best deals on laptops. For more deals, you can click on its More Coupons Cash Back link.<br />
I use both of Bing and AAfter; I use Google lesser than them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitri</title>
		<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2010/02/07/three-ways-find-cool-deal-google/comment-page-1/#comment-207697</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/?p=2118#comment-207697</guid>
		<description>My pleasure.  I am a long time reader, first time commenter; I am glad that you recognized that my intention was only to contribute in a constructive manner.

Cheers,
Dimitri</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My pleasure.  I am a long time reader, first time commenter; I am glad that you recognized that my intention was only to contribute in a constructive manner.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dimitri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbhunter</title>
		<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2010/02/07/three-ways-find-cool-deal-google/comment-page-1/#comment-207691</link>
		<dc:creator>mbhunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/?p=2118#comment-207691</guid>
		<description>Dimitri:  Thank you for explaining those subtleties.  I don&#039;t think I would have caught them.  I&#039;ve fixed the post.  Very much appreciate you taking the time to explain!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dimitri:  Thank you for explaining those subtleties.  I don&#8217;t think I would have caught them.  I&#8217;ve fixed the post.  Very much appreciate you taking the time to explain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeanLifeCoach</title>
		<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2010/02/07/three-ways-find-cool-deal-google/comment-page-1/#comment-207684</link>
		<dc:creator>LeanLifeCoach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/?p=2118#comment-207684</guid>
		<description>I love learning new trick and tips, thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love learning new trick and tips, thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitri</title>
		<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2010/02/07/three-ways-find-cool-deal-google/comment-page-1/#comment-207645</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/?p=2118#comment-207645</guid>
		<description>Oh.... the explanation of the * operator is a bit off too.  The previously referenced links will explain why, but in a nutshell, it is not about related terms, it is about unknown terms within a defined string.  Read here:
http://www.googleguide.com/wildcard_operator.html

Your example of [* laptops coupons] is identical to [laptops coupons] because you are telling Google to return documents with &#039;laptops&#039; and &#039;coupons&#039; and anything else.  However, a search for [&quot;coupons * laptops&quot;] is different.  That will return pages that match &#039;coupons for laptops&#039;, &#039;coupons for Dell laptops&#039;, &#039;coupons blah blah blah laptops&#039;, etc.  However, it will NOT match &#039;laptops blah blah coupons&#039; because the word order did not match the query.

Clear as mud?

Cheers,
Dimitri</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230;. the explanation of the * operator is a bit off too.  The previously referenced links will explain why, but in a nutshell, it is not about related terms, it is about unknown terms within a defined string.  Read here:<br />
<a href="http://www.googleguide.com/wildcard_operator.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.googleguide.com/wildcard_operator.html</a></p>
<p>Your example of [* laptops coupons] is identical to [laptops coupons] because you are telling Google to return documents with &#8216;laptops&#8217; and &#8216;coupons&#8217; and anything else.  However, a search for ["coupons * laptops"] is different.  That will return pages that match &#8216;coupons for laptops&#8217;, &#8216;coupons for Dell laptops&#8217;, &#8216;coupons blah blah blah laptops&#8217;, etc.  However, it will NOT match &#8216;laptops blah blah coupons&#8217; because the word order did not match the query.</p>
<p>Clear as mud?</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dimitri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitri</title>
		<link>http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/2010/02/07/three-ways-find-cool-deal-google/comment-page-1/#comment-207643</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mightybargainhunter.com/?p=2118#comment-207643</guid>
		<description>Your example of the &#039;or&#039; operator is a bit off, semantically.  The operator takes precedence, so the way it is written [laptop coupons OR laptop deals OR laptop promotions] is interpreted as [laptop (coupons OR laptop) (deals OR laptop) promotions].  Note, that the first term of &#039;laptop&#039; is required, as is the last term of &#039;promotions.&#039;  The two OR statements both have the option of &#039;laptop,&#039; therefore that search is identical to just searching for [laptop promotions].  ...and it shows in your returned results, which only list results matching [laptop promotions].  I think you meant to search this string:
[laptop (coupons OR deals OR promotions)].
THAT will get the results you are looking for.

Also note: the &quot;pipe&quot; character can also be used in place of the word OR.  So, the following string is identical:
[laptop (coupons&#124;deals&#124;promotions)]

To learn more about proper syntax in advanced Google searches, try reading the linked docs at the bottom of this Wikipedia page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_hacking

Cheers,
Dimitri</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your example of the &#8216;or&#8217; operator is a bit off, semantically.  The operator takes precedence, so the way it is written [laptop coupons OR laptop deals OR laptop promotions] is interpreted as [laptop (coupons OR laptop) (deals OR laptop) promotions].  Note, that the first term of &#8216;laptop&#8217; is required, as is the last term of &#8216;promotions.&#8217;  The two OR statements both have the option of &#8216;laptop,&#8217; therefore that search is identical to just searching for [laptop promotions].  &#8230;and it shows in your returned results, which only list results matching [laptop promotions].  I think you meant to search this string:<br />
[laptop (coupons OR deals OR promotions)].<br />
THAT will get the results you are looking for.</p>
<p>Also note: the &#8220;pipe&#8221; character can also be used in place of the word OR.  So, the following string is identical:<br />
[laptop (coupons|deals|promotions)]</p>
<p>To learn more about proper syntax in advanced Google searches, try reading the linked docs at the bottom of this Wikipedia page:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_hacking" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_hacking</a></p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dimitri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

